Driver loses lawsuit against City of Surrey, worker

Judge doesn't buy woman's version of events after Scott Road collision in 2012.

A woman who sued the City of Surrey and a maintenance worker for a 2012 collision has lost her lawsuit.

Roshan Ara Ali claimed that truck driver Rajinder Sandhu and the City of Surrey were responsible for a collision that took place near the exit of a parking lot on Scott Road near 95 Avenue.

The city and Sandhu argued that Ali was at fault because she illegally passed Sandhu’s 40-foot truck on the right.

Ali testified on her own behalf, claiming she was leaving the parking lot of her bank when she got stuck behind a large, slow-moving truck. She said she moved her vehicle to the right – the direction she wanted to turn on to Scott Road – believing the truck was turning left. She then claimed the truck’s reverse lights came on and it reversed into her, striking the side of her car on an angle.

Sandhu, who was servicing sewer pipes and manholes for the city, testified he was making a right turn onto Scott Road – under the direction of two safety workers – when he heard a “crunch.” It was only then, he said, that he saw Ali’s vehicle on his right. He said he was never backing up in the parking lot.

The investigating Surrey RCMP officer testified Ali’s version of events was not consistent with the vehicle damage he saw, as there was no damage to the rear of the truck Ali claimed had reversed into her.

In her  Feb. 1 decision, Justice Martha Devlin sided with the city and Sandhu, noting Ali was not a credible witness.

“Her version of events was sometimes vague and changed throughout her testimony, depending on what aspect of her testimony was challenged,” said Devlin. “As a result her testimony was internally inconsistent and contradictory.”

The judge also questioned Ali’s revelation that in 2014, two years after the crash, she encountered a woman who had witnesses the incident. While first saying she didn’t know the woman, phone records showed she had prior contact – a suggestion Devlin said the plaintiff tried to “explain away” at trial.

“Ms. Ali’s explanation of how she discovered the supposed witness…was most damaging to her credibility even though [the witness] did not testify at trial.”

Devlin concluded Ali was solely responsible for the collision, dismissing her lawsuit, with costs.

 

Just Posted

Surrey celebrates multiculturalism with annual Fusion Festival

The two-day festival returns to Holland Park

RCMP investigate two shootings in Surrey

Incidents happened in Whalley, Newton

Surrey Board of Trade fears SkyTrain expansion will impede other transit needs

‘We need transit improvements in all of Surrey,’ Anita Huberman says

Public hearing set for two Surrey modular housing projects for homeless

Surrey council set to vote Monday on projects in Guildford, Whalley

Rich the Vegan scoots across Canada for the animals

Rich Adams is riding his push scooter across Canada to bring awareness to the dog meat trade in Asia

Canadian high school science courses behind on climate change, says UBC study

Researchers found performance on key areas varies by province and territory

UPDATE: One dead after house fire in rural Maple Ridge

Dewdney Trunk Road closed, traffic being re-routed

Six inducted into BC Hockey Hall of Fame

The 26th ceremony in Penticton welcomed powerful figures both from on and off the ice

Highway 1 closed near Revelstoke

No estimated time for opening

CRA program to help poor file taxes yields noticeable bump in people helped

Extra money allows volunteer-driven clinics to operate year-round

Recall: Certain Pacific oysters may pose threat of paralytic shellfish poisoning

Consumers urged to either return affected packages or throw them out

How a Kamloops-born man helped put us on the moon

Jim Chamberlin did troubleshooting for the Apollo program, which led to its success

Most Read