Surrey - The Editor, Re: "A safer Surrey: Is it just a dream?" the Now, May 8. Your article highlights some of the impacts of having a chronically understaffed police department.
Surrey has fewer police per capita than any other community in the Metro Vancouver area. The impact of that means not only more crime, but it also takes a toll on those who provide the policing service.Recent data shows Surrey RCMP police officers carry criminal caseloads that are 78 per cent higher than comparable metro police forces. What does that mean for the public? In a community more than twice the size of Vancouver it means increased response times, less visible police presence, and crimes that do not have anyone to investigate them. Sixty of the 95 officers promised over the next five years will be consumed simply by population growth.There is no magic answer. If you want to catch criminals, you need enough police investigators to get the job done.We need the help of the community as well - doing your part can make it difficult for car thieves, burglars, and gangsters to work here. However, investigating crimes and responding to violent incidents needs to be done by skilled police officers.I have worked at the Surrey detachment for 20 of the past 22 years, and the reality is, the detachment is constantly dangerously short-staffed. Using security guards and other resources may provide some relief, though if history repeats itself, once the media attention fades, those resources will likely fade away as well.We want our city to be safe. We live here, our kids go to school and play here. We want all families to be safe when they are out playing, going for a walk at night or simply going to the store to get groceries.Trying to reduce crime in a community that is growing as quickly as Surrey while having a police force that has half the police officers compared to surrounding areas is a recipe for disaster and results in more crime, not less.S/Sgt. Mike InglesSurrey