COLUMN: Democracy and civil liberties at risk

The Fair Elections Act has good intentions, but it will fundamentally – and negatively – change the voting system in Canada.

On Feb. 4, Pierre Poilievre, the Democratic Reform Minister, introduced Bill C-23 (The Fair Elections Act). This Act attempts to tackle illegal robocalls, voter fraud, and other issues related to election results and investigative powers. It would also raise the amount of donations that can be given to political parties, from $1,200 to $1,500 annually.

However, while the Act attempts to rectify election issues, the Bill itself threatens democracy and fairness.

Restrictive voter ID laws would prevent voters from using voter information cards as identification, and also prevent a person from “vouching” for another individual who does not have a voter ID with him/her at the polling station.

According to the chief electoral officer, Marc Mayrand, this would affect nearly 100,000 individuals and have an especially negative effect on aboriginal voters on reserves, young Canadians, and seniors. He also stated that Elections Canada would not be able to support StudentVote anymore.

StudentVote is a program that allows Canadian students in elementary and secondary schools to participate in a simulated student vote day, before the real election day. I remember taking part in this initiative in high school. Not only does this program allow students to experience voting, but it can have the potential to encourage students to vote throughout their lifetime and become engaged with the political process. According to the StudentVote website, around three million Canadian students have taken part in these student vote days.

Furthermore, Elections Canada would also be restricted from encouraging Canadians to vote and would only be able to notify voters of how, when, and where to vote. Such measures are a threat to the health and safety of Canadian democracy.

To truly ensure fairness in elections, it is important that we promote voting and ensure full accessibility for voters. The so-called Fair Elections Act, in fact, seems to contradict its very purpose.

Similar to Bill C-23, which challenges Canadian democracy, Bill C-24 (Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act), which was introduced last week, could put Canadian civil liberties at risk.  Potential Canadian citizens also face stricter language and knowledge-test requirements, with citizenship applicants not being able to use an interpreter anymore. These new measures come after the government’s previous weakening of the family reunification program, and health care cuts for refugee claimants.

While there are some positive aspects to the Act, such as those affecting “Lost Canadians” and those serving in the Canadian Forces, other aspects could threaten justice and civil liberties, especially by giving greater ministerial power over citizenship revocation.

In certain cases, dual citizens could be have their Canadian citizenship stripped, and government would have “authority to revoke Canadian citizenship and deny it to PRs who are convicted of terrorism, high treason, treason, or spying offences” and also “expands bar on getting citizenship to people with foreign criminal charges and convictions” (see

While we must ensure that those who commit acts of terror receive the proper punishment for their crimes, we must maintain the supremacy of our justice system, and not hand over the reins of justice to temporarily elected officials.  Additionally, a Canadian dual citizen could also be falsely accused of terrorism or crimes in foreign countries with corrupt regimes.

According to UBC Research Fellow Efrat Arbel: “The proposed provisions allowing the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to strip dual nationals of Canadian citizenship are deeply concerning. The Canadian criminal justice system already has established mechanisms by which to effectively punish individuals who commit unlawful acts.”

In order to ensure a truly democratic and just society, it is important for our federal government to understand that introducing new legislation, without considering the long-term ramifications on Canadian society, can be extremely harmful.

Japreet Lehal is a student at Simon Fraser University Surrey. He writes regularly for The Leader.


Surrey North Delta Leader

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Sources, City of White Rock launch Thanksgiving Food Drive

Volunteers, donations sought for annual food-bank initiative

Surrey man charged with series of break-ins in Surrey, Langley

David Sinh Liu is facing 10 charges related to seven recent break-ins

COVID-19 exposures at Surrey schools: An updated list

Fraser Health has created a new webpage listing COVID-19 cases in schools

Future of Massey Tunnel replacement in the air after snap election called

On Friday the ministry said it was identifying property ‘necessary for future infrastructure improvements’

COVID-19: 4 more deaths, 366 new cases in B.C. since Friday

A total of 8,208 people in B.C. have tested positive for COVID-19 since January

Group wants Parliament, courts to hold social media to same standard as publishers

Daniel Bernhard made the comments shortly after Friends of Canadian Broadcasting released a research paper

COVID-19 testing lineup wraps around block in Chilliwack

Testing lineup includes seniors, children and their parents as demand seems to surge

B.C.’s Chase Claypool catches first NFL touchdown pass

Abbotsford grad establishes new record for longest scrimmage TD by a Canadian

Join Black Press Media and Do Some Good

Pay it Forward program supports local businesses in their community giving

B.C. has highest number of active COVID-19 cases per capita, federal data shows

B.C. currently has 1,803 active cases after weeks of COVID-19 spikes in the province

181 days gone: Family continues to look for man last seen in RCMP custody 6 months ago

Brandon Sakebow’s last known location was leaving Mission RCMP cell, police say; family has doubts

Most Read