More police do not reduce crime, let alone stop it, one reader argues. What do you think? Email us at edit@surreynowleader.com. (Now-Leader file photo)

Opinion

LETTER: We are looking to wrong source for public safety in Surrey

We really need to ask how we might defund police and properly fund community resources

The Editor,

Re: “Does Surrey need its own police force?” Now-Leader, Sept. 21.

Discussion about the nature and future of policing in Surrey is important and something that seriously needs to be undertaken.

It is good that the Now-Leader is giving some of that discussion an extended focus.

Unfortunately too much of the debate over policing in Surrey is framed in a limiting way, setting the boundaries of discussion according to the wrong question.

The real issue is not, “Does Surrey need its own police force?”

What we really need to ask is this – why are solutions to social problems posed predominantly as matters of policing in the first place? And a related question might be – why are we so willing to fund police at such high levels rather than necessary social services and resources that receive comparatively less?

The article notes that from 2012 to 2018, the RCMP grew from 661 officers and a cost of $101 million to 835 officers and $160 million.

Mayoral candidate Tom Gill puts that at one-third of the city’s operating budget. That is going to policing functions alone.

Much more than funds for community groups and resources that can build the relationships and supports that make communities safer long term and stop social harms before they happen.


Yet those who want a municipal force are willing to spend even more, including $50 million in transition costs, on policing.

This is getting it all wrong. More police do not reduce crime, let alone stop it. They do not make communities more safe (but may make them more dependent on police).

We really need to ask how we might defund police and properly fund the community resources (schools, community centres, groups, projects) that really build our safety and security, and which so desperately need funding.

Dr. Jeff Shantz, Surrey



edit@surreynowleader.com

Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram and follow us on Twitter

Just Posted

Surrey business groups dig in heels on LRT

Mayor-elect Doug McCallum and his coalition aim to cancel LRT in favour of extending SkyTrain

New faces on Surrey council: Who they are and how they got here

The council includes seven of eight candidates who ran with Doug McCallum-led Safe Surrey Coalition

UPDATE: Missing Surrey girl, 15, located

Surrey RCMP sought help to locate Hailey McClelland

Surrey’s mayor-elect McCallum has big promises to keep

From estimated 337, 289 eligible voters in Surrey, 109,791 votes were cast for 32.5 per cent turnout

Dancing zombies expected in droves at Surrey’s ‘Thrill the World’ event

Michael Jackson’s iconic video inspires group-dance gatherings around the globe

B.C. sailor surprised by humpback whale playing under her boat

Jodi Klahm-Kozicki said the experience was ‘magical’ near Denman Island

Vancouver mayoral hopefuly admits defeat, congratulates winner Kennedy Stewart

Ken Sim of the Non-Partisan Association apologized for the time it took to acknowledge Stewart won

Mental fitness questioned of man charged in Chilliwack River Valley shooting

Peter Kampos told his lawyer ‘his dreams are being stolen and turned into drugs’ at Surrey Pre-trial

Fraser Valley mom stuck in Africa over adoption delay

Kim and Clark Moran have been waiting four weeks to bring son home

B.C. government moves to tighten resource industry regulations

New superintendent will oversee engineers, biologists, foresters

Election watchdog seeks digitally savvy specialists to zero in on threats

Move follows troublesome evidence of online Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election

More court before Dutch man charged in Amanda Todd case is extradited here

Appeals must be dealt with in Europe, before charges faced in B.C.

Most Read