Port has no authority to decide about coal

Port Metro Vancouver, apparently don’t even have the appropriate jurisdiction of responsibility to make an informed, competent decision.

With all due respect to the employees at Port Metro Vancouver and Fraser Surrey Docks, as a concerned British Columbian who resides on the Sunshine Coast, I have one question I would request be answered in relation to the current review process involving the coal terminal expansion proposal.

How is it possible that the entire responsibility in deciding the outcome of this review process and the ultimate permission to proceed with this initiative is borne by Port Metro Vancouver, when Port Metro Vancouver has clearly stated that they have no jurisdiction and no responsibility beyond the mouth of the Fraser River and their own port land facilities?

This fact alone seems to be a basis for what will amount to extraordinary legal challenges and perhaps exhaustive litigation over the real possibility of damages to health, quality of life, land, sea, and air for innumerable communities, neighbourhoods and citizens, owing to an obviously flawed permitting process.

Talk about passing the buck. Forget Fraser Surrey Docks, forget Texada Quarrying Ltd., forget Lafarge, forget Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.

There appears to be just one single proponent for this ill-considered scheme and they, Port Metro Vancouver, apparently don’t even have the appropriate jurisdiction of responsibility to make an informed, competent decision that would ensure that the interests of all those potentially affected would be considered adequately.

Perhaps some rethinking of the approval process for this rather large initiative is in order?

 

Alan Morgan, Powell River

Just Posted

Seniors plead to Surrey council ahead of public hearing for 1,000-plus unit development

In June, seniors in the buildings said they felt ‘left in the cold’ as plans for redevelopment materialized

Several people in custody following reports of shots fired into a Surrey home

Police say the incident happened in the early hours of Saturday morning

Surrey RCMP asks for public’s help to find missing 15-year-old boy

Prabhjot Singh Gill was last seen Dec. 6 in the area of 140th Street and 66th Avenue

Surrey 37 per cent behind in housing supply projections

Of 18 cities in Metro Vancouver, only City of North Vancouver and Richmond met or exceeded projections

Winning Christmas card art shown at Surrey gallery

Arts Council of Surrey’s annual competition won by Edwin Stephen and Nancy Painter

MAP: Christmas light displays in Surrey and beyond

Send us pictures of your National Lampoon-style lit-up homes, nativity scenes or North Pole playlands

Campbell River mom’s iPhone containing priceless photos stolen from Victoria hospital parkade

The phone contained photos, heartbeat recordings of her late son

Miller nets winner as Canucks edge Sabres 6-5 in OT

Roussel, Leivo tally two apiece for Vancouver

‘Norovirus-like’ outbreak interrupts Bantam hockey showcase in Greater Victoria

Several athletes were sent home, quarantined on the ferry

Strong turnout of volunteers to search for missing senior

Ted Vanderveen disappeared in rural Maple Ridge on Nov. 28

$578: that’s how much your first distracted driving ticket will cost with recent premium hikes

Over 50 per cent of Canadians admitted to using phone while driving last year, according to study

SkyTrain strike to begin Tuesday with ‘full shutdown’, CUPE says

BCRTC president says job action is ‘completely unacceptable’ to use SkyTrain users ‘as leverage’

Kelowna man attempts to steal bait bike from RCMP parking lot

38-year-old Brian Richard Harbison is facing several charges

Owners of hotels on Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside fight $1 expropriation in court

Vancouver City Council voted to expropriate the properties for $1 each in November

Most Read