Target waste at its source

The Rethink Waste Collection Program is no different than punishing a drug addict for the drug trade.

Re:  Frank Bucholtz, “Waste reduction, overhauling garbage,” The Leader, Sept. 27.

I am all in favour of reducing waste, but I must disagree with the entire point of this editorial because Surrey’s new Rethink Waste Collection Program is not something to be celebrated. Instead, it should be recognized for what it is, a program that reduces current service levels and penalizes taxpayers for something completely out of their control.

The article states Surrey was one of the first cities to contract out garbage collection with immediate savings. I think it goes without saying that in the subsequent years of contracting out garbage collection, the cost to the taxpayers of Surrey has constantly increased. That rate would have been much less if the city had continued to provide  garbage collection. I believe the only benefit from contracting out the service is it removes a bargaining chip from the unions.

Nonetheless, Surrey’s Rethink Waste Collection Program basically punishes consumers. By making the taxpayer sort the garbage, store the garbage for an additional week because of the reduced service, and  financially penalizing any household that cannot maintain garbage within the  arbitrarily set limitations, I am not sure how anyone could even try to say this program is innovative. I am sure there are unique family dynamics like blended families, etc. that will be penalized simply because of a large number of children living at home generating more waste through consuming more than your “average” household. What about the families that must keep generations together in the same house just to afford housing costs? The only thing I see from this program is further increases in illegal dumping throughout Surrey which is already a big issue.

The Rethink Waste Collection Program is no different than punishing a drug addict for the drug trade. Households are being held accountable for all of the waste made by manufacturers of products. Instead of punishing households for the management of garbage we should expand our efforts to reduce waste at its source, not at its end use.

 

Greg Mitchell, Surrey

Just Posted

New police force in Surrey must avoid VPD, RCMP errors made in Pickton case: Oppal

Boots are scheduled to be on the ground by spring 2021

PHOTOS: Surrey designer uses toilet paper to make a dress for annual Toronto show

‘The dress is very experimental and avante garde,’ says Guildford-based Alex S. Yu

Police issue warning after four overdoses in North Delta

Police and emergency health services use naloxone to revive four overdose victims Thursday morning

Surrey reacts to policing plan getting the green light

Former mayor, councillors and residents weigh in on the Public Safety Minister approving the transition

Trudeau vows to stand firm against ‘increasingly assertive’ China

China has accused Canada of meddling in its affairs

Conan turns to the Property Brothers for tips on buying Greenland

Jonathan Scott suggests removing glaciers and mountains to bring in ‘more natural light’

Forests minister visits B.C. town rocked by multiple mill shutdowns

A third of Mackenzie turns out for rally, not much to cheer about

B.C. sockeye returns drop as official calls 2019 ‘extremely challenging’

Federal government says officials are seeing the same thing off Alaska and Washington state

North Van music teacher accused of sexual misconduct involving girls

Police believe other victims could be out there after the arrest of Lamar Victor Alviar

B.C. family stranded in Croatia desperate to come home

Funds being raised to bring back mom and two children

B.C. man on trial for daughters’ murders says an intruder broke in

Andrew Berry takes stand in his defense for December 2017 deaths of young daughters

‘Plenty of time for a deal’: Teachers’ union expects kids back in school on Sept. 3

BCTF says class size, composition at the heart of the issue

Most Read