Delta tenants burned out in fire lose lawsuit against landlord

 

DELTA — A Delta couple who was burned out of their rented home has lost a lawsuit against their landlord who didn’t install smoke alarms.

The judge decided the landlord’s failure to install the alarms didn’t necessarily result in the losses the tenants claimed.

Kenneth Boon and Leona Douglas sued Kashmir Mann in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver, with Justice Robert Punnett presiding.

"I am satisfied that the defendant was negligent in not installing and maintaining smoke alarms," Punnett decided. "However the plaintiffs have failed on the balance of probabilities to establish that negligence caused the losses claimed."

Boon and Douglas were tenants in a residence Mann owned in Delta. On

July 12, 2011, a fire broke out in their suite, killing one of their dogs.

The couple claimed Mann was negligent by failing to install smoke alarms and sued him for loss of property, personal injuries, wage loss and future care costs.

Boon and Douglas argued Mann owed them a duty of care to ensure their home was reasonably safe for use and that he should have done so by installing smoke alarms.

All residential buildings in B.C. require smoke alarms.

Mann argued that no fault or negligence can be ascribed to him considering the cause of the fire remains unknown. Even if Mann were negligent, his counsel argued, the plaintiffs have not approved a causal link between that and the losses they claimed.

Boon and Douglas took possession of their suite on April 1, 2011 but did not sign a tenancy agreement. The court heard that when the tenants did their initial inspection, they noted there were no smoke alarms. They claimed Mann agreed to install them, claimed they reminded him to do so several times during their tenancy and that they even offered to buy some alarms themselves if he agreed to deduct the cost from their rent.

The plaintiffs said Mann repeated that he would install the alarms himself, but never did.

Mann testified he didn’t know if the house had smoke alarms when he bought it in 2007 or 2008 and didn’t know if he had installed them. The plaintiffs testified they themselves installed three fire extinguishers which were functioning at the time of the fire.

The couple, their guests and four dogs were in the house at the time of the fire. The court heard Douglas woke up at 11:50 p.m. to go to the bathroom and heard what she thought to be rain. This was on July 12, 2011.

Entering the hallway, she saw fire reflected in glass doors leading to another room and smoke at waist level rolling down the hallway from the kitchen, where the dogs were kept. She went to the kitchen and saw a hole in the ceiling with flames licking through it and across the ceiling.

"She screamed for her husband and ran to her sister and brother-in-law’s room to wake them up," Punnett noted. "She had trouble rousing them, having to yank her brother-in-law from the bed by his leg to wake him."

Douglas tried to call 911 but the telephone cut out before she could complete the call. A neighbour called 911 at 11:51 p.m. and the fire department arrived seven minutes and 29 seconds later.

Everyone escaped, but one dog perished in the fire. Boon ran back inside trying to rescue it, suffering minor burns as a result.

They told the court they didn’t have time to use the fire extinguishers because by the time they awoke the fire was too large. It destroyed the kitchen, and part of the roof. There was also smoke and water damage.

Cause of the fire remains unknown.

During the trial Mann’s legal counsel produced a report from Sereca Consulting Inc., written by Christopher Reed, an expert in fire investigation and analysis.

Reed also testified. He told the court the intent of a smoke alarm is "to provide early warning to occupants to allow safe egress," not protection of property.

Reed noted the exact effect of smoke alarms on property loss is difficult to assess.

"The damage to the property would not have been lessened had appropriate detection equipment been in place," he told the court.

"It is therefore my opinion that the absence of attempting to suppress the fire, the response time of the fire department and the various rapid fire growth scenarios that are possible suggests that the overall spread of the fire could not have been contained had smoke alarms been in place."

Punnett concluded "on the balance of probabilities" that no smoke alarms were installed. He also found no evidence when the fire started, how long it had been burning before Douglas discovered it, "and no evidence other than mere conjecture that the presence of smoke alarms would have awakened Ms. Douglas or the other occupants of the premises earlier.

"There is simply no basis upon which to conclude that had smoke alarms been present the fire would have been capable of extinguishment by them or the fire department in sufficient time to prevent any loss," the judge decided. "To reach that conclusion would be speculative at best. The plaintiffs have failed, on the balance of probabilities, to establish that the defendant’s negligence was causally linked to the losses claimed. As a result I need not address the issue of damages. I dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for want of proof of causation."

tom.zytaruk@thenownewspaper.com

Just Posted

Air helicopter called to scene after report of shots fired in Abbotsford

Incident Monday afternoon in the area of Ross and Simpson roads

Surrey Mounties investigate drive-by shooting in Fleetwood

It happened Monday afternoon in the 8000-block of 153A Street. Police say no victim has been located.

18-year-old to hospital after shots fired in White Rock

Police investigating early-morning incident

White Rock RCMP unaffected by Surrey’s choice of police force, city says

Mayor Darryl Walker to meet with RCMP Staff Sgt. Daryl Creighton

VIDEO: Marvel Comics’ Stan Lee dies

Marvel co-creator was well-known for making cameo appearances in superhero movies

VIDEO: Newcomer kids see first Canadian snowfall

Children arrived in Canada with their mother and two siblings last week from Eritrea

Feds dropped ball with WWI anniversary tributes: historians

Wrote one historian: ‘Other than the Vimy Ridge celebration … I think they have done a very bad job’

Sides ‘far apart’ in Canada Post talks despite mediation, says union

The lack of a breakthrough means rotating strikes will resume Tuesday

Feds’ appeal of solitary confinement decision in B.C. to be heard

Judge ruled in January that indefinite such confinement is unconstitutional, causes permanent harm

Touching note left on Lower Mainland veteran’s windshield

A veteran is hoping the writers of a note know how much he was touched by their kind words.

B.C. health care payroll tax approved, takes effect Jan. 1

Employers calculating cost, including property taxes increases

Nunavut urges new plan to deal with too many polar bears

Territory recommends a proposal that contradicts much of conventional scientific thinking

Shelter struggles: Landlord takes over rental unit whenever visiting B.C. town

Renter’s story highlights how hard it is to find accommodation in Revelstoke

Most Read