Letter writers argue residents south of the Fraser are paying too much – in taxes and in tolls – for the new Port Mann Bridge.

Bridge over troubled taxpayers

Ads extolling the benefits of the new Port Mann Bridge aren't convincing these letter writers.

I presume the ad(s) for the new Port Mann Bridge are geared to those living south of the Fraser.

They extoll the benefits of saving up to an hour’s travel time per day. They extoll the relief from congestion drivers will realize.

What they won’t say is how families will make up the $1,400-$1,500 lost each year to tolls. They won’t say why South Fraser residents are being forced to foot the bill not only for the bridge, but the Highway 1 Improvement Project that runs into Vancouver. They won’t explain why, for decades, Surrey/Langley residents supported infrastructure north and east but now must pay for their own.

They won’t tell you that the Liberals and TransLink are deliberately keeping us in our cars so we will pay for it. They won’t be forthcoming in their rationale for not spreading the pain, as has been the practice until now.

And they certainly won’t explain why Vancouver has become an “untouchable.”

Then there’s the completely laughable notion that the Pattullo Bridge is a viable, free alternative. Well, I suppose it is… if you work from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m.

It’s time for mayors and citizens south of the Fraser to have a serious conversation. Do we want to keep sending $160 million a year (Surrey’s portion) to TransLink for next to nothing in return, or do we want to use that money to start building our own infrastructure? Are we getting good value for our tax dollars?

Janice Crawford, Surrey

 

Not bridging logic

I don’t have a problem with the government using advertising to persuade people to use the new Port Mann Bridge, but they haven’t followed their own reasoning to its logical conclusion.

They say the new bridge will save an hour each day for commuters who use it during peak periods. I’m sure that’s true. But what about those of us who are unemployed, retired, or have part-time jobs and can therefore wait to make our trips outside of rush hours? Why should we pay the same toll when we won’t be saving anything like an hour per day?

The answer is to adjust the tolls according to time of day: a premium price during peak periods, a reduced price outside peak periods, and completely free during the slack hours late at night. This seems fairer, and could do as much to relieve rush hour congestion as adding an extra lane.

Alan T. Chattaway, Surrey

Just Posted

White Rock Renegades ‘04 named national champs

Girls went undefeated at national tournament in Calgary

South Surrey woman promotes exercise to help fight Parkinson’s disease

‘This keeps me strong’ says Liz Holroyd Campbell, organizer of the 2019 Parkinson Superwalk

PHOTOS: Supercars parade to White Rock

More than a dozen cars were on display for the Drive Project

QUIZ: How much do you remember about Woodstock?

Weekend music festival in Bethel, New York, was held 50 years ago

Advocates ‘internationalize’ the fight to free Raif Badawi from Saudi prison

Raif Badawi was arrested on June 17, 2012, and was later sentenced to 1,000 lashes and 10 years in jail for his online criticism of Saudi clerics

Canadian entrepreneurs turning beer byproduct into bread, cookies and profits

Some breweries turn to entrepreneurs looking to turn spent grain into treats for people and their pets

Canada ‘disappointed’ terror suspect’s British citizenship revoked

Jack Letts, who was dubbed “Jihadi Jack” by the U.K. media, has been detained in a Kurdish prison for about two years

Chrystia Freeland condemns violence in Hong Kong, backs right to peaceful assembly

There have been months of protests in the semi-autonomous region

B.C. VIEWS: Log exports and my other errors so far in 2019

Plastic bags, legislature overspending turn out differently

Most Read